2014 Level II MPS according to 300 Hours

[ltj]

I think he’s going for the reverse psychology there. Like “if I keep convincing myself the MPS is 65+, it will end up being lower”.

I see right through that. Right through it!

[love_lord_s]

@tickersu

@love\_lord's

It is futile to discuss about MPS

Yet, you’re one of the biggest speculators in these threads.

@love\_lord's

But its surely between 65% and 68% for L2…

And you somehow have certainty in this assertion, despite your claim that it’s a futile attempt…

1. Yes, i HAD been one of the biggest speculators…

2. Yes, i have seen some scores which give some sort of certainty for MPS to be in that range

3. Yes, i myself feel its difficult to arrive at MPS as an exact percentage after all this

4. Whats wrong in being over-excited after an exam in which we put so much time n effort?

[love_lord_s]

@ltj

I think he’s going for the reverse psychology there. Like “if I keep convincing myself the MPS is 65+, it will end up being lower”.

I see right through that. Right through it!

Hats off to your pschology related skills. Clap Clap!

[tickersu]

@love\_lord's

1. Yes, i HAD been one of the biggest speculators…

2. Yes, i have seen some scores which give some sort of certainty for MPS to be in that range

3. Yes, i myself feel its difficult to arrive at MPS as an exact percentage after all this

4. Whats wrong in being over-excited after an exam in which we put so much time n effort?

1. You were still speculating earlier today…

2. Sure, but there’s certainly many scores we haven’t seen that leave it quite uncertain (in fact, the scores using the 40/60/80 method don’t really mean anything unless those assumptions are true or close to the truth-- I haven’t seen anyone substantiate this assumption)

3. It’s difficult because the score bands are so wide (and there’s one for each topic), we don’t have exact scores, and we’re dealing with a (likely) biased sample

4. Nothing is wrong with being over-excited. I don’t recall saying anything about that, specifically.

Be happy it’s done!

[Harrogath]

@love\_lord's

In fact you must score good in all topics in order to secure a pass. What I found in that book is that many people did bad on quantitative and economics which are around 20% of the exam both (for Level 1 in that time), you don’t talk about those. Many people take care about the “important” topics and still fail.

It is futile to discuss about MPS…But its surely between 65% and 68% for L2…

Anyways, wish you best of luck for Peru’s QF at Copa America and the results offcourse!

Thank you, I hope we win this time La Copa América!, NOT lol, unlikely unfortunately. Good luck for you too on the results!

[Harrogath]

@tickersu

@Harrogath

In fact you must score good in all topics in order to secure a pass.

I would say it’s a bit of a stretch to say you need “good” performance at a minimum (especially if you can pass with <70% overall). I would say “good” performance would land you an 80% on the entire exam, at least (assuming we could know the score).

Well, if a candidate pass, I think he did good on the entire exam. CFAI apparently does not use 80% as a “good” since the pragmatic MPS is around 65%. Maybe when you get a final score near to the MPS would be labeled as an “enough”, but we will never know anyway.