pokhim
July 30, 2015, 9:29am
#21
Consummate_Professio:
My preliminary, unconfirmed results indicate a PASS
I appear to have done well on the afternoon session, scoring 70+ percent on 8 out of 10 item sets (1 was 51-70% and 1 was <=50%). This implies a maximum possible score of 92%, a minimum possible score of 73%, and an average score of 83%.
My morning session results were worse than expected. 4 out of 11 item sets were 70+ percent correct, 4 out of 11 item sets were 51-70% correct, and 3 out of 11 item sets were <=50%. Using the appropriate points per question (which range from 14-20pts), this implies a maximum possible score of 75%, a minimum possible score of 43% and an average score of 59%.
In total, including morning and afternoon sessions, the greatest possible maximum score is 83%, the smallest possible minimum score is 58%, and the mean score is 71%.
My guess is that I scored around a 75% +/- in total. My minimum formulas assume 0% for <=50% categories which is a rather harsh/conservative assumption. If I were to use 25% (the midpoint) instead of zero, that immediately brings the total overall average to 73%.
Respect! I have a feeling my morning will be worse that this… But afternoon might be on par…
My preliminary result was a pass. Score matrix was:
AM: 8 questions >70, 1 question 51-70, 2 questions <50
PM: 6 item sets >70, 3 item sets 51-70 (including Ethics), and 1 item set <50
i’m still curious on those who saw they failed band 9/10 what’s their score like…
manuag
July 30, 2015, 10:21am
#24
can you guys please let us know on below:
Go to CFAI website log on, go to your candidate resources, click on registration confirmation. In the field that is supposed to give details of you registration, what is the error code that you see? We’re on a sep thread and discussing if this is an indication of pass/fail…
8 “A” for AM!!! show us your experience.
Becoz’ of the heavy traffic, our result might be got stuck on the road coming to us, no worries guys
saadi
July 30, 2015, 3:05pm
#28
Congrates…may i knw whts ur result in Institutional investor portion…
Consummate_Professio:
My preliminary, unconfirmed results indicate a PASS
I appear to have done well on the afternoon session, scoring 70+ percent on 8 out of 10 item sets (1 was 51-70% and 1 was <=50%). This implies a maximum possible score of 92%, a minimum possible score of 73%, and an average score of 83%.
My morning session results were worse than expected. 4 out of 11 item sets were 70+ percent correct, 4 out of 11 item sets were 51-70% correct, and 3 out of 11 item sets were <=50%. Using the appropriate points per question (which range from 14-20pts), this implies a maximum possible score of 75%, a minimum possible score of 43% and an average score of 59%.
In total, including morning and afternoon sessions, the greatest possible maximum score is 83%, the smallest possible minimum score is 58%, and the mean score is 71%.
My guess is that I scored around a 75% +/- in total. My minimum formulas assume 0% for <=50% categories which is a rather harsh/conservative assumption. If I were to use 25% (the midpoint) instead of zero, that immediately brings the total overall average to 73%.
Consummate_Professio:
My preliminary, unconfirmed results indicate a PASS
I appear to have done well on the afternoon session, scoring 70+ percent on 8 out of 10 item sets (1 was 51-70% and 1 was <=50%). This implies a maximum possible score of 92%, a minimum possible score of 73%, and an average score of 83%.
My morning session results were worse than expected. 4 out of 11 item sets were 70+ percent correct, 4 out of 11 item sets were 51-70% correct, and 3 out of 11 item sets were <=50%. Using the appropriate points per question (which range from 14-20pts), this implies a maximum possible score of 75%, a minimum possible score of 43% and an average score of 59%.
In total, including morning and afternoon sessions, the greatest possible maximum score is 83%, the smallest possible minimum score is 58%, and the mean score is 71%.
My guess is that I scored around a 75% +/- in total. My minimum formulas assume 0% for <=50% categories which is a rather harsh/conservative assumption. If I were to use 25% (the midpoint) instead of zero, that immediately brings the total overall average to 73%.
u getting short or longer eroor?
What and why are we that concerned ? Let go
Mol
July 31, 2015, 10:40am
#32
Does everyone have the added section of “Event Profile” in their CFA account?
Some new indicator about something ?
lagging/leading indicators lol
I wrote a Matlab code with Bayesian dynamic factor analysis to forecast results. It implements text data analysis (what AF users write here) in the multivariate regression set-up, partially with dummy variables, partially with an auxiliary Markov-switching model. The model fit as per the last couple years of CFA L3 results has been very high (Akaike, Schwarz, HQ). It is THE innovation in Financial Econometrics ever since Stock/Watson did their seminal paper. Let me know if you wanna apply this preliminary code, as I’d be happy to receive feedback from people implementing it to their own data. I’d be happy to asssist in running the code, only problem is, you gotta do the dirty work and capture all the data extracted from this form in an excel sheet. In Octovber I’m gonna travel to Stockholm to pick up my Nobel price.
I’ve got it on my Manage Account page, but I’m not familiar enough with that page to know if it has been there previously.
Yes, but I think that’s always been there. I don’t think it just now appeared.
