55+ marks for me T.T
Me, too. I failed at band 10. you can understand my feelings :v
I really hope most of the peope who worked hard towards the exam will pass the exam! I understand that people want to get some confidence or assurance of the result to pass this 2-month time.
By reading a lot of posts on this forum and other CFA forums, I think overall over 70% should be safe and can assume you can pass. The thing is that, you might have guessed wrong. Your final exam mark might be much lower, much higher or about right / than what’s in your mind now.
Having said that, again, I think overall over 70% should be a pass score.
Good luck! It will be a very difficult 2-month.
I don’t really remember any of the questions, and it has not passed even 2 months…
Does anybody have the estimations for the past years’ MPS?
I have started a new thread “MPS by Linear Discriminant analysis.” See that thread and my blog www.resourcetepee.com – look for “CFA Level 3 MPS” under “free personal finance calculators”.
As a default in this calculator I have the estimated scores in the beginning of this forum thread of 55% in AM and 70% in PM. My calculator estimates that someone with this score is likely to Pass and is estimated to be 63.3 percentile amongst level 3 candidates (per 2013 results you only need to be about 51 percentile to pass). Try your own estimated scores. The website describes limitations of the analysis. Should be an interesting and entertaining exercise even if 2014 results are very different and the calculator is off the mark.
Levfings
I am in the same boat with you
does it mean a fail if I messed up with the PM session but did all right in the AM
seems everyone here nailed PM with flying scores
is there anyone who passed but did better in AM than in PM?
I believe I did way better in the morning than the afternoon.
Three posts back I refer to an analysis. This analysis supports a greater likelihood of a pass with higher scores in PM. The model I derive is that a pass may be likely if
0.154*(pm score) + 0.115*(am score) - 16.5 >= 0
The model places a greater weight on the pm score. This is because the pm score counts twice in the absence of a three parameter model including ethics scores. A high pm score is being used as a surrogate for ethics in the two factor model due to the likely correlation of the total pm score to the ethics score. (Which is 20% of the total pm score)
However doing better on am then pm is definitely not too much of a concern if you did well on the pm ethics. The level 3 exam would be more balanced if there were some am ethics too.But I wouldn’t advocate am ethics too strongly (in case I have to take level 3 again!)
2 days for results and this post will be moot.
Somehow this post reminded me of Edupristine. The correlation between the content of this post and the context of the content of Edupristine’s, is positive in a negatively positive way. A rational educated calculated objective guess confirms the variability of the constant cyclical derivative.