Helpful Notes

Not sure if you’ve read the entire thread, but a few have been pointed out to the author. If you can contribute, Im sure all of us following will appreciate you pointing them out as well.

If I’m not mistaken, this should be in the reading for concentrated single asset positions, whichever number that is.

Adam, thanks for the notes. A number of good points that explain a topic better than what I have in my notes.

Thanks for this.

Is 422 correct?

Delta of call = delta of put + 1

Sounds right.

Sum of absolute delta is 1.

Put delta is negative.

so

call delta - put delta (negative negative =positive) = 1

call delta = 1+put delta.

#weoffervickytoshowourTHANKS

#oursmurfette

Im sure that its in passing in the readings, but it’s not a learning outcome statement. If it’s not an LOS, then it’s a nice to have vs. need to have. I guess my point got lost somewhere. These are great and if there is something you dont know when reviewing these bullets, just see if it’s required learning. That’s all.

Thank you for the good work adam!

Its actually an LOS…reading 19 on currency management

g. Describe trading strategies usde to reduce hedging costs and modify the risk-return characteristics of a foreign-currency portfolio

Then section 6,3 -Strategies to Reduce Hedging Costs and Modify a Portfolio’s risk profile

Subsection 6.3.5 Seagull Spread.

BOOM.

has somebody thrown the notes into Word yet?

I feel I also need to contribute, so here it is

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xolWjKkf244

Well starting with the summary reading now

Lets see how much i know in it

And there it is, the LOS, all I ever wanted LOL. I think I may have lumped that in the “not likely to come up” category in my head, so I forgot about it (I know, I know… I should know better than that) Thanks for pointing out Mr. BOOM

[original post removed]

If you find any errors let me know and I will fix.

I think point 35 is wrong ?

If u hedge foreign market risk and not currency = foreign risk free rate

Point 77 seems wrong ? local sharpe ratio?

No this is not wrong. Pure Segmentation assumes the market is unaffected by global economy which is the reason why the correlation will equal 1. If you are not given local market statistics just assume the global Sharpe is equivalent to the local sharpe

You are correct on 35 it has been fixed thanks for the catch sorry for the typo

The last 3 recommendations especially fees and gift look dicey in AMC

I think they are required and nit just recommended

No they are not required. All the required things in the asset manager code are vague. All the recommended things are specific. You should know them both as one question may be for both required and recommended while one man just be for required. It seems this would be way more common than a gips recommended question

Thanks man

These have been of great help

May god bless u