BWYF!!! yeah, I never would have gotten it. I’m rusty on sequences and never would have thought to go there. I would like to review them and see if I concur with your answer just for fun. Maybe for my birthday next month I will go somewhere tropical, lay on a beach, and learn sequences.
I thought your “operating assumption” was diamond=1. You concluded that diamond=5 later, which calls into question the validity of some earlier steps (particularly when you were finding solutions to the equation a+4b+c=18).
Also, we end up f(5)=5 and f(8)=21, so we conclude that f(n)=n(th) Fibonacci number? Great job for picking up this relatively obscure pattern from just two examples, but without any additional information on constraints there are endless “solutions” to what f(n) might be.
But I guess like others have mentioned earlier, this is not a math problem but a pattern-finding problem where you are free to make up the rules and find any internally-consistent logical system that fits the symbols. So in that regard, you clearly solved it.
No, I was just trying to steer people in the correct direction, and they had previously assumed diamond = 1. At that point, they were working on the circle, square, triangle part of the problem. a and c cannot both equal 1 because they would then not satisfy the other equations.
You are correct that there are other functions that could satisfy f(5)=5 and f(8)=21. Care to throw some out there?
Yep, that definitely satisfies the those two equations. I wouldn’t really want to have to calculate the last equation, though: f(f(n) would be the below. Yuk. I did think about that though, there are certainly infinite solutions. However, I’d be surprised if the below was the answer for which they are looking.