Can you explain the rationale as to why when the account is taxable, you include inflation. But when it’s just withdrawals that are taxable, you tack it on afterwards?
I did find one example that doesn’t appear to be in line with this logic. 2003 #9 (I know it is far back, but these IPS questions are still the same IMO).
Says that income and cap gains are taxed… according to this thread, that would imply you need to adjust for inflation first. However, the answer suggests grossing up for taxes, then adding inflation.
I suppose an exam question from 11 years ago shouldn’t be of too much concern, but I’m just curious as to why the calculations are different on subsequent exams.
Schweser does mention to use the conservative approach that is assuming inflation is taxable ( add inflation then gross up) when nothing is mentioned in the vignette. But like S2000magician said, the vignette does tell you which method to use.
S2000magician you have made this confusing concept clearer now. THANK YOU!
The Trust Porfolio should earn a return sufficient to cover the living expenses of recipient, taing taxes to consideration and allowing both inflation (expected to be 2%) and modest growth (1%). Income and capital gains are taxed at 30%, and this tax treatment is not expected to change.
I think that trusts are taxable. In that case, the entire return (inflation plus growth plus living expenses) should be taxable: add inflation and growth, then gross up for taxes. If the answer said otherwise, they got it wrong.