Or when someone says “I think the decision will have to be partly quantitative and a little bit of this”…*proceeds to lick index finger and hold it up in the air*
The place I work now doles out punishment for using favorite phrases from one of our buzz-word loving investors - incremental, granular, 30,000 foot view, etc. Least favorite by far though is cautiously optimistic…
I used to be guilty of using ceteris paribus, but got tired of telling people what it meant so I stopped. I’m in b-val and we sometimes conclude that the value of something is de minimis because we’ll almost never say something has zero value.
When people talk about multiplying initial investments over time with the suffix “bagger,” as in, “if you had invested in XYZ asset class over the last ABC years, you would have experienced a five-bagger…”
Produced this elevator speech this morning, just for fun:
“I’m a business copy writer, I leverage high-profile bizspeak to add mission-critical positioning to best-of-breed nonsense that places innovesque solutions at the forefront of client mindshare in order to incent optimal stickiness.”
Absolutely. We have a rule – three douchey statement limit and then the meeting is over. No explanation, no social graces, we just tell the manager to pick his @$$ up off of that Italian leather chair and get the f*** out of here. Then we add a “That’s it, Skippy, pack your s#!t. Let’s go!!”
At that point, it scarcely matters if they know why they were discharged. We are doing our small part to violently filter the stuffed shirts directly out of the industry, one lost mandate at a time.