He’s not necessarily being unethical. I mean, he passed all the exams (unbelievable), somehow got the 4 years required experience (again, unbelievable), then got into a bunch of porn dealing and rediculously complex insane rants that took a lot of work to write without paragraphs or most puntuation. 100% sure he could not pass a drug screen tho.
Black Swan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > He’s not necessarily being unethical. I mean, he > passed all the exams (unbelievable), somehow got > the 4 years required experience (again, > unbelievable), then got into a bunch of porn > dealing and rediculously complex insane rants that > took a lot of work to write without paragraphs or > most puntuation. 100% sure he could not pass a > drug screen tho. I wasn’t referring to him, I think he’s likely just a head and personally I feel that as long as you aren’t a skinner no one should judge you for what you do sexually. I personally don’t believe his behaviour warrants being denied the use of his CFA designation. What irks me are people who really have no integrity, people like Chiang. People who are dishonest, overtly egocentric or otherwise selfish money hungry assholes are the ones who make this profession look bad.