Least Douchey Luxury Sedan

Sorry to break it to you, but chicks don’t like Acura. It’s regarded as a car brand for nerds, Asians, and people who want an especially nice Honda. I am speaking as a former Acura owner. The people who said they liked my car were: 1) Asian nerds, 2) gas station service attendant. If you are going for the sensible girl, save some money and get a Camry instead.

In general, here is the heirarchy of car brands in terms of appeal to women:

  1. Super luxury: Maserati, Aston Martin, exotic brands, maybe Porsche.

  2. Audi (chicks love Audi), brands whose starting model is still pretty expensive: Jaguar, Porsche.

  3. Normal luxury: BMW for under 35. Mercedes or Lexus for over 35.

  4. Start of non-luxury: gaymen brands: Volkswagen, Fiat. Maybe Acura, but it’s more like when you say it’s a “nice car” after sitting in it, rather than recognizing the car itself. The same for Lincoln, Buick, Cadillac. Volvo. Some high end non-luxury Japanese cars: Nizzan Z or similar sports cars. Top trim of Honda Accord, etc.

  5. Normal brands: Toyota, Honda, Subaru, Ford, Nissan, some models of Hyundai.

  6. The cheapest cars: Nissan Versa, Toyota Yaris, Kia, some models of Hyundai.

BMW under 35, MBZ or Lexus over 35? I dont’ think so. I would say BMW for Liberals and MBZ/Lexus for Conservatives.

Chicks just like saying “Maserati”.

So do I.

^Again, I think this depends on your geograpic location and what subclass of people you’re dealing with.

Of course, all chicks love superluxury cars like Maserati, Rolls, Ferrari, etc. (Because if you have one of these, you obviously have a lot of money.)

After that, the lines become blurry. In rural/working class Texas, if you drive a Dodge Ram dually, then you’ll have plenty of chicks who want to get in your truck. (The “luxury” edition of this would be a Chevy Silverado Texas Edition or a Ford Platinum.)

Oddly enough, even though the Toyota Tundra is probably a better vehicle, and it’s actually made in Texas, it’s not considered “pussy bait” like the American trucks are. I have no idea why.


And in my hometown, with the Hispanic population, you could buy a $2000 car, put $1000 worth of rims on it, $2000 worth of speakers and audio equipment, some neon undercarriage lights, and a $1500 paint job, and this would be your “chick-magnet-mobile”. (Yep. Kinda like putting a $50 flea collar on a 50-cent dog.)

Then somebody steals the rims, you bust out the speakers from playing them too loud too much, and wreck the car, which ruins your $1500 paint job and neon lights. No problem, just start over from scratch with another $2000 car.

What’s your take on Infinity?

Although it is painful to admit it, Infiniti has made some questionable business decisions in the recent past and as a result, has lost much of the brand equity that it has built over the years. This is a pity, as some previous Infiniti models, such as the G35 and soon to be defunct G37, were very special cars. Furthermore, in changing the naming convention of their models to the new Q- and QX- system, Infiniti has destroyed the goodwill associated with their model lineup. Consumers do not know that the M sedan, which beat the BMW 5 Series in a C&D comparison test, continues as the “Q70”. Consumers who see their neighbor’s nice 2012 JX crossover will now be confused that this name no longer exists and has been replaced by the “QX80”.

This, along with Infiniti’s “me too” approach in softening and genericizing their cars to appeal to Asian consumers, has made their brand anonymous, confusing, and much less special than it once was. Among all luxury car brands, Infiniti is the only brand that does not currently offer a single car that I would consider buying, except the legacy G sedan or coupe, which will soon be continued. Perhaps the fact that Infiniti still produces the 2013 G sedan says something about the consumer response to their new models.

Some parallels can be drawn between Infiniti and Acura. Both are luxury divisions of Japanese companies that are still considered a tier below the Germans or even Lexus. Both brands have attempted to broaden their market base by making their cars less unique and more like the market status quo. However, Acura has made a strategic decision to target the price point that is just above the non-luxury market. Acura no longer wants to compete with Audi or BMW. By making new cars like the TLX, they are focusing on buyers who would otherwise buy an Accord EX-L or Toyota Avalon. By doing so, I believe that Acura can not only deliver outstanding value, but might be able to find a viable, albeit limited, market niche.

If anything, Honda has shown an admirable willingness to admit and try to fix their mistakes, thereby partially redeeming themselves in the eyes of their customers. Consider the dramatic 2013 overhaul of the poorly received 2012 Honda Civic, or the redesign of the 2012 Acura TL, whose previously over ostentatious “beak” grill ruined the car to potential buyers.

Infiniti, on the other hand, continues to chase BMW and Mercedes by making more expensive cars that offer their interpretation of advanced technology. The problem is that Infiniti has neither the name recognition of these German competitors, nor the engineering or manufacturing capabilities that differentiate the Germans from other companies. On top of this, the Chinese market, the focus of now Hong Kong-based Infiniti, has a general preference for Western car brands, rather than Japanese brands like Infiniti or Lexus. Until Infiniti finds a new brand identity or a better way to distinguish itself, they will continue to fight an uphill battle and remain in the shadow of other brands.

^ You’re working in the wrong profession.

Yeah I liked the g37s

A bit of a hit to Audi’s status as least douchey.

http://news.yahoo.com/2-accused-attacking-vegas-school-crossing-guard-194905808.html

Cliff Notes version: Audi driver and his passenger beat up a school crossing guard after crossing guard waves his stop sign at them.

I don’t judge. I want to do that every morning and I drive a Hyundai…

I found it interesting that they twice noted the make of car in the article.

I get the feeling that Audi’s reputation is drifting more towards BMW level douchebaggery.

On a related note, I found out recently that my Audi can park itself, so you can drive into a car park, get out the car, press a button on a smartphone app and the car will drive into the carpark, find a space and reverse park into it . All the while you can watch the progress on your smartphone through the cameras on the car or just fuck off and do what you need to do. Then when you come back, you press another button on the app and it drives itself back to where you got out. How fucking cool is that? It’s slow as fuck but still pretty cool. I haven’t tried it yet but have seen a video of it.

Also, I’m loving how the old people that help school kids to cross the street are called ‘School Crossing Guards’ In the UK we call them ‘Lolly Pop Ladies’

Audi A4 is the new douchemobile. At some point, $30k millionaires realized that they can pay less for an A4 than for a 328i while maintaining the same curb appeal (especially to girls). Hence, the migration has started.

It might not ever be 100% migrated though, since BMW 3 Series buyers think because they bought this car, they are “enthusiasts” and this justifies their driving like assholes.

I think apart from the A7 and A8 which are classy, the other, smaller Audis look very boring.

Hey, there are lolly pop men too! I won’t stand for this prejudice!

^ I thought they’d been phased out after Saville…

Do they hand out lolly pops to the kids while crossing the street?

In Canada, we just have our kids trained up and they self police the crosswalks (not even kidding). Its a big deal civic service kind of thing here. Being a grade six crossing guard lieutenant is serious status at the elementary school, all the kids want to be one.

^ I think that has more to do with full employment in Alberta than anything else. Over here, we have full grown adults fighting over these jobs.

^ These “jobs” are PAID elsewhere?!!?? What?