Yeah I see your point. But, I bought $10k of SSO yesterday. It’ll be my first ever “long-term” investment. Whatever that means. I’m still scared to be risk-on over the weekend during these times.
It is the volatility impact. The impact of volatility is not linear, so as you increase from 2x to 3x you have a linear increase in leverage but a non linear increase in the impact of volatility. So it depends if the expected return from leverage offsets the volatility drag.
The impact of volatility is not linear, so as you increase from 2x to 3x you have a linear increase in leverage but a non linear increase in the impact of volatility.
Thanks! I’ve read about this effect but didn’t realize it increases with the leverage factor. So basically the value of a leveraged ETF “melts” a) the higher the leverage factor b) the more volatility there is. Correct if I’m wrong. Tanks!
Not sure I know what melts means, but it means the hurdle rate for returns is higher. As you increase leverage, the breakeven return needed to make the strategy at least match the regular index
increases. Over long time periods, sometimes 3x works out better. But even in these situations, 2x is still better than 1x. While there are many situations where 2x works and 3x doesn’t.
And nery it has nothing to do with interest or premiums. But yes it has to do with volatility.