Human females become pregant very easy, hence the overpopulation problem. It also seems like anti-logic, since if women were programed to bang 1000 guys, they wouldn’t have this negative emotional incentive not to do so. Yet the negative incentive exists.
I don’t think that a debate regarding competition for fertilization would be a “logical” one. It would be a scientific one (regarding observation and not deduction or induction, for example).
You geeks trying to explain the myriad complexities of emotional connections and sexual behavior is kinda like me trying to explain quantum physics. Sure, I could google it and quote some crap that I’ve read somewhere, but in reality, I understand absolutely nothing.
The “logic” presented is that thru evolution women want to get banged once a day, by a different guy each day, so that they can get pregnant (fertilization theory). Yet if this were true women today would not be wired the way they are, and the results of the study would not be what they are. It is only true when a woman is in heat, and bangs the whole frat house, to ensure getting preggo during that window. There is no reproduction incentive to bang different guys on different days into perpituity.
Talking about “how a woman is raised” is fine and dandy, but kinda flakey, and off topic. Instinct drives these things and crosses family lines. The question is not why does she bang a lot of dudes, the question is why does she feel unhappy when she does so.
Have you ever studied logic? You’re citing a premise that you claim is self-evident (though pretty dubious to anybody familiar with a vagina). You have not used logic to develop that premise or support it. It’s not a logical argument. You suck.