Your objection is to the deal that they had, in the same way that Nery objects to the deal boomers have with social security. Regardless, the deal was made and the dreamers abided by it. I’m curious if Greenie’s objection is specific to social security, or if he’s making a principled stand on government rejection of deals.
Deals change, it was an executive order and those are frequently subject to change. Everyone was aware fo this. It is also based on temporary work permits. These are all non-permanent in nature, there really was no binding agreement, trying to recast it as such is as usual, twisting the point.
if they want free migration. then they should have no protection. no minimum wages. no labor laws. this is how you properly disincentivize.
I mean, so is social security. They’ve raised eligibility ages, changed payouts, and are currently running a ponzi scheme that will impact those who aren’t already withdrawing from the system. There really is no binding agreement, trying to recast it as such is as usual, twisting the point.
I’d wonder why he’s wearing it upside down.
Shouldn’t the muzzle be up?
I never said anything about SS and I don’t treat it as a binding agreement, so I’m unsure what you’re on about. I think you’re just devolving to incoherent rambling in place of a point in keeping with the theme of the thread.
Wearing it muzzle up is uncommon for non-hunting rifles. That is a less common way to carry though.
I did though, and you responded to me. I think you’re just devolving to incoherent rambling in place of a point in keeping with the theme of the thread.
mmmmmmm…
Right, but you made my point. SS is in the same boat and is experiencing the same changes… Nice try, but you’ve either rambled into conceding points from earlier or just moved the goal posts lacking any clear logic for your position. It’s sad, really.
What are you two chicken heads on about?
ur mom
Sad!
Cluck, cluck, cluck
Even with the muzzle down, I think that he’s wearing it wrong (if he wants to use it). First, he’d have to be left-handed, and second, if the pulls it round to the left to fire, it’ll be upside down.
Perhaps that should make everyone feel safer.
Don’t try to mess with me.
You didn’t even notice which way those muzzles were pointed.
omg that blonde chick is fire
Muzzle down is pretty common. Theoretically, it’s better to have an accidental discharge into the ground than into the air, because bullets come back down… Doesn’t really apply on hard surfaces though.
You are correct that it’s pretty useless being upside down. Chances are, he carries it on the range/at the house slung in front of him, muzzle down and to the left. Then when he wanted to be sharp and carry it in public, he held it that same way and slung it over his back with zero consideration about the fact it would now be upside down.
Got a new DD MK18. Basically carbon clone of this:
