A more detailed look at 2014 L3 LOS changes

I know there have been posts by Sooraj and others discussing 2013/2014 changes, but the below update - posted by FinQuiz this morning - seemed helpful; I thought I’d share if anyone who’s interested didn’t see it:

http://www.finquiz.com/blog/2013/08/19/changes-to-the-2014-level-3-cfa-curriculum/

Changes to the 2014 Level 3 CFA Curriculum Posted on August 19, 2013 by josephhogue

The changes to the 2014 Level 3 curriculum from last year’s edition are the most extensive I have ever seen. Seven readings have been dropped, two readings have been replaced and one reading has been added. In all, the number of readings has dropped from 43 to 35 in the 2014 curriculum.

The de-emphasis on emerging markets and international assets is clear with most of the material dropped or fit into other readings with a generalized spin. This follows the general theme in the markets as international and emerging markets have fallen out of favor against a more generalized approach.

Most of the LOS changes are the more minor wording-type changes that really do not change what you need to study or understand. I have tried to catch the more important LOS changes below but most of the changes will come from the new or replaced readings.

As we’ve talked about in other posts, it’s up for debate whether new material is tested more heavily or not on the exam. I doubt that the Institute would try to trip up repeat testers that haven’t focused on new material but it’s intuitive that they would want to test the new material to see how candidates adopt it. Regardless, it’s important to understand the new directions the Institute is taking and to plan your studying accordingly.

Changes 2013 – 2014 Reading 13, “Low-Basis Stock” is replaced by “Concentrated Single Asset Positions.” While the two topics will have some similarities, i.e. low-basis stock is often a concentrated position for management, the LOS have changed and repeat candidates may want to spend some extra time here.

Study Session 5, Institutional Investors has a new reading, Reading 17 – “Allocating Shareholder Capital to Pension Plans” along with three new LOS.

LOS 18-b has been greatly simplified from a specific mandate to a more simplified, “discuss challenges in developing capital market forecasts.”

Last year’s Reading 20 in SS7, “Dreaming with the BRICs” has been dropped from the curriculum.

SS8, Reading 19 Asset Allocation has four new LOS (k through n). Three of these address portfolio effects from nondomestic assets, replacing a little of the lost emphasis from the dropped readings.

Last year’s Reading 22 in SS8, “The Case for International Diversification” has also been dropped.

Last year’s Reading 26 in SS10, “Hedging Mortgage Securities to Capture Relative Value” has been dropped

Last year’s Reading 30 in SS12, “Emerging Markets Finance” has been dropped

Readings 32 and 33 from SS13, “Swaps” and “Commodity Forwards and Futures” have been dropped to the massive cheers of candidates everywhere. Good material but extremely tough and why was there so much detail on derivatives anyway?

Reading 35 in SS14, “Currency Risk Management” has been replaced with Reading 28, “Currency Management: An Introduction.” It looks like the material is a little more basic though many of the LOS look the same. You’ll probably recognize most of the material if you took last year’s exam but don’t neglect the reading because there is quite a bit of new stuff here.

Study Session 16 is now called, “Trading, Monitoring, and Rebalancing” from last year’s, “Execution of Portfolio Decisions; Monitoring and Rebalancing” though the readings have remained the same and the LOS changes are relatively minor wording-changes.

Reading 42 from SS17, “Global Performance Evaluation” has been dropped

We’ll cover the changes to the level 2 exam in two weeks. Let me know if you have any questions or need something covered.

‘til next time, enjoy your break! Joseph Hogue, CFA

Source: FinQuiz.com

nice one, thanks mate.

It’s interesting that the changes are the most extensive they’ve seen for level 3.

also interesting that the changes for Level 2 from 2012 - 2013 saw a de-emphasis on emerging markets and international assets as well

Glad to see the Commodities & Swaps readings were dropped. They seemed oddly placed amongst the other readings. SS17 was painful to study. I’m glad I won’t be reading that sh!t again. The EM reading was 10 years old. It’s about time they removed it.

It seems like this is a huge push to make the exam much more qualitative. SS13 & SS17 were entirely quantitative.

While I am pleased with the changes, this only means that the CFAI will be testing even more microscopic material than they were before.

If only they would drop GIPS and Ethics.

^ and IPS

^Why not scrap L3 all together then? :stuck_out_tongue:

Thanks gottasay!

“Study Session 5, Institutional Investors has a new reading, Reading 17 – “Allocating Shareholder Capital to Pension Plans” along with three new LOS.”

I think this is a mistake. From CFAI http://www.cfainstitute.org/CFA%20Program%20Study%20Session/2014_L3_StudySessions_combined.pdf, reading 17 “Allocating Shareholder Captial to Pension Plans” is dropped and reading 17 (originally reading 18 in 2013) is now under Study Session 6, also there is no new LOS except slight change of wording to 15.a.

The rest seems to be okay.

Good luck to you all.

Nice overview

Thanks Gottasay

Here is a good comparison of the LOS changes from 2013 to 2014

http://passingscorefinance.com/LOS/2013-2014/Level3LOS2014.pdf

So many things were dropped and i don’t see a lot of things being added - or perhaps the things added are not mentioned?

It sounds a lot easier now, damn it, i wish they made the changes earlier!!!

^ you passed already.Now please be happy for us :o) and I hope you are not from Yokohoma.

I am just thinking all those late nights i experienced… perhaps it the curriculum was shorter i didn’t have to stress so much!

good luck with you though!!! :slight_smile:

I have just been through my 2013 textbooks, amending them for 2014 curriculum changes.

I am really surprised how much has actually been cut, some of them were tough to follow at the time.

With so many readings being dropped, while studying it could make some of the past papers interesting. Working out whether we need to know that old reading or not.

Very good hand writing :slight_smile: and you’re welcome.

Thanks, if some many readings have been eliminated, then how in the world volume 1 is 10 pages more, volume 2 is 50 pages more, than previous year?

Good for us…