Hi guys, I have a question when I am reviewing the short extension strategy under Equity portfolio Management section.
I was using _ Scheweser _ notes so quoted the paragraph as below:
" The short-extension strategy is a more efficient and coordinated portfolio of long and short positions. Long positions are only taken in under-valued (or at least neutral-value) stocks and short positions are in over-valued stocks. in contrast, a seperate 100/0 plus 20/20 strategy would first invest 100% of capital in the market portfolio (and nothing short, hence the 100/0 designation). Then it would take 20% of capital in offsetting long and short positions in under-and over-valued stocks (the 20/20). T here is inherent inefficiency in this approach as the 100% long market portion will involve buying some of the same over-valued stocks which are shorted in the 20% short position."
What I couldn’t understand well is the difference between 120/20 and the 100/0 plus 20/20 strategy. Why the 100% long position would not just buy undervalued stocks while 20/20 is long 20% undervalued and short 20% overvalued? Did I miss something here to difference the two strategies listed as comparison?
Thanks in advance!