What does these two statements mean?
low pairwise correlations with other asset classes is not sufficient. Asset classes should have return premium based on market risk factor ( beta) and not skill of the investor
What does these two statements mean?
low pairwise correlations with other asset classes is not sufficient. Asset classes should have return premium based on market risk factor ( beta) and not skill of the investor
Low pairwise correlations with other asset classes is not sufficient - you need to evaluate correlations across the entire portfolio, not just between two asset classes.
Asset classes have a return premium based on their sensitivities to risk factors e.g. B(Rp - Rf). Investor skill is not a risk factor.
i see. thanks
i think the second one refers to for example the additional return you would expect for investing in a small cap index fund compared to a broad index fund. the small cap index fund is riskier but you are still investing passively so you expect a return premium proportional to the beta of the small cap index. the beta of the broad index will likely be 1 and beta of the small cap index greater than 1