Break-even Analysis computes the exact change in yield that would eliminate a bond’s yield advantage over another bond. True or False?
False
I dont get why would you say it is false? Dont tell me they are saying it is due to the convexity factor… I would say it is true… Unless its a wording issue of what exactly “exact” really means?
It’s false. Breakeven analysis is only an approximation.
Ok, so it is an “exact” issue, just like a change in is not exactly approximated by the Mdur but they ask you to compute the exact change without considering convexity…
quorky Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I dont get why would you say it is false? Dont > tell me they are saying it is due to the convexity > factor… > > I would say it is true… > > Unless its a wording issue of what exactly “exact” > really means? whenever you say exact - 99% is false. And yes, that is due to convexity and other stuff
I agree but they dont apply it uniformly across the spectrum of their questions… I consider convexity an important factor that I have accepted to ignore for the exam based on all of their assumptions…
Look out for “extreme” wording - ie, exact, only, always, etc. Most exams like to screw people with stuff like that.
if assumption says “ignore convextiy” or “for very small shifts” then you can ignore it
Yeah, I seem to have fallen for this one… thanks for the refresher
most of the stuff is approximations. There is hardly anything “exact” on this exam
Exactly
I am just so tired, i cant even think straight anymore… I hope logic will kick in after I get some rest and I will not fall for questions like these. On the exam I always look at questions like these with a lot of skepticism due to it being seemingly easy.
quorky you will pass and so will pimp. that is my projections
the average number of bp for breakeven analysis is like 10 - 20 in the examples we have been dealing with. is convexity really that much of an issue? the convexity point is well taken, but this is really splitting hairs.
I appreciate the vote of confidence and dont have a doubt my self that you will pass… I have been waiting for this for a while… If I pass, it will make me more marketable to leave my current position… The plan for tomorrow is to review for a few hours and then just relax and watch some TV…
asdffdsa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the average number of bp for breakeven analysis is > like 10 - 20 in the examples we have been dealing > with. is convexity really that much of an issue? > the convexity point is well taken, but this is > really splitting hairs. In all honesty, not really… thats why I got thrown off… Most of the problems deal with very small numbers. I don’t think it makes any diff, but technically it is still an approximation… Actually a lot of things are… Return projection, actuarial life expectancy table that feed the liabilities, structured product, risk, this exam is an approximation… etc