Compliance officer vs Supervisor in Ethics

Guys

I am not able to understand when one has to report to compliance officer and when to supervisor like in this question

Kenny Barrett, CFA, is working in the Australian office of American Investments Co. From an informal conversation, Barrett learns that the company’s most recent investment report was based on misappropriated information. No one at the Australian office expresses concern, however, because there has been no breach of Australian law. Barrett should: A) do nothing because the branch is outside of U.S. jurisdiction. B) seek advice from company counsel to determine appropriate action. C) disassociate himself from the case with a written report to his supervisor.

First supervisor, then compliance. You proceed in the right pecking order.

If the compliance officer shrugs it off, then dissociate.

So whats ur answer doe my question?

b?

Yes b