Hi everyone,
Could someone help me out with this please? Thank you.
My questions
For Scenario 1, I do not understand why the future value is computed using the risk-free rate. Given that you want stock exposure, doesn’t it make more sense to use dividend yield of 2.5%?
For Scenario 2, I think it makes sense to use risk-free rate in computing future value because you are getting a synthetic cash position so your future value should be based on risk-free rate.
Scenario 1
Text: Manager A holds $25,000,000 market value of 3-month Treasury bills yielding 1% and wishes to create $20,000,000 of synthetic S&P 500 stock exposure for three months. The S&P contract is priced at 1,750, the dollar multiplier is 250, and the underlying stocks have a dividend yield of 2.5%.
Question: Calculate the number of contracts to buy or sell and the zero coupon position to take. Assume the desired beta is the same as the futures beta at 1.07.
Answer: Nf = [(1.07 – 0)/1.07] × [($20,000,000 × 1.01^3/12) / (1,750 × $250)]
Scenario 2
Text: Manager B has a large position in U.K. stocks that are similar to a major U.K. stock index. She wishes to create GBP 15,000,000 of synthetic cash earning 2.0% for a six-month period. The futures index contract is priced at 3,700 with a multiplier of 10. The stocks have a dividend yield of 3.0%.
Question: Calculate the number of contracts to buy or sell and the amount of synthetic cash created. Assume the desired beta is the same as the futures beta at 0.95.
Answer: Nf = [(0.0 – 0.95) / 0.95] × [(15,000,000 × 1.02^6/12) / (3,700 × 10)]