Creating Synthetic Cash

Hello - I am somewhat confused by a problem in Schweser 2012 Practice Test Book 1; Test 2; Afternoon question 37 (page 133). This question asks to convert a $3 billion position into synthetic cash by selling futures contracts. As I was working on this question, it dawned on my that I have two different ways to create synthetic cash in my head.

#1) [(Target Beta - Portfolio Beta) / Futures Beta] * ( V / (Pf)*multiplier ) (using a Target of 0 or .25)

#2) - V * (1 + RF)^T / (Pf)*multiplier

The answer to the question uses the second formula. However, I used the first when I saw the question. Of course my answer was there as a wrong answer. The answer key doesn’t provide any information as to why. If someone can please let me know when to use which formula, I would be most grateful

Thank you very much.

#1 changes the portfolio exposure using futures. #2 creates synthetic cash. the question asks for synthetic cash. do what they ask.

Page 361 of book 5 of CFAI text has an example

hi jana in this example could you explain how do we arrive at no. of units of stock.

I understand that no. of stock units = (V/S) * (1+delta)^T ---------- (A)

how does (A) equal to -(N*q) / (1+delta)^T ?

I intutively work it backwards.

At the expiration of future liability to settle = [St - F] x N* x q-----> So we owe = N*q F, it would be worth St x N* x q

Now equations # of contracts N = V (1+Rf)^ t / q F

Effective amount required (due to round off)

V * = N* x q x f / (1+Rf)^t…we put this much money in risk free bond which grows to V* (1+Rf)^t—> equivalent to our liability at expiration of future…

Now at expiration we will receive St (price at expiration) x N* x q…here due to dividend reinvestment

effective no of stocks = N* q / (1+delta) ^ t…which will grow to N* x q due to reinvestment of dividends

I hope i made sense & have got it right!

one is for hedging and the other is to create synthetic cash, both question and answer are clear.