this is from memory so i am probably wrong, but S x e^(r*t) = 107.255, which is what it’s worth in 6 months, so if the current price is $100 he has no credit risk, the other party has the risk that he wont pay of $107.255 - $100 or 7.255, for B.) it’s the other party again for $2.25, and fo c.) the risk is his at $110-107.255 at $2.745
The contract is worth 105 at expiration in 6 months, today it is worth 105/[(1+.0425)^.5] = 102.84. If current price is 100 then the long investor assumes the credit risk that the CP will not pay. at 105 and 110 the CP assumes the credit risk.
I agree with Fin Ninja, and you can see it in Risk Management: Reading 6.2.2 (Reducing Credit Risk by Marking to Market), Forward contracts are established at the price they will be, so we need to work backwards to find the price it is at 6 months.
On a side note, some forwards are marked to market and then at the 6 month time the two parties would settle and establsh a new forward price moving forward.
There’s also some Credit Risk questions on the 2009 morning session that involve calculating derivative positions. I wasn’t ready for it - needed to go back and refresh.
When Asset is priced at 100 - the Long’s position is 100 - 102.84 = -2.84.
So Long would actually owe the short 2.84 . so Short bears the potential credit risk. Rocci is right in this aspect.
for b) and c) - the Long’s position is 105 - 102.84 and 110 - 102.84.
In both these cases - the Short owes money to the Long. If the Short declares bankruptcy - he would owe that money to the long. But if the long declared bankruptcy - he would have an asset worth that amount. So LOng bears the potential credit risk in these cases.
Identify who is better off in the spot market, opposite party to him bears the credit risk
for a) Current price = 100 PV of frwrd = 102.84
so long party is better off in the spot market (i.e. his stock whose CMP is only 100 but he has agreed to pay for this by going long at 102.84 - so he would happy in the spot market if not got long in the frwrd market) - Opposite party (i.e. short party) will bear the credit risk.
for B) & C) long is getting the stock cheaper in frwrd market than the spot market so short party is better off in spot market. Opposite party to short (i.e. long party) bears the credit risk
Another way to understand -
Look out for the one who can make money by closing frwrd contract & doing transaction in spot market
i…e CMP 100 PV of frwrd 102.84
short party will close the frwrd at 102.84 to long & will buy the stock in spot only for $ 100. He will gain $2.84 so he bears the credit risk if long party defaults & shows his unableness to honor the obligation for buying stock at agreed frwrd rate.
for B & C - long party can make gain by closing frwrd contract & seling the stock in spot. So he bears the credit risk