Sorry for the tenth question on currency appreciation vs depreciation.
So from reading similar questions, I understand that given a convention of X/Y, Y is the base currency. If X/Y appreciates, and if X/Y is say 1.2, after appreciation it will be 1.25.
How does this not apply to USD/JPY.
USD/JPY from January 2016 was ~120
USD/JPY now is ~110.
Given the convention as described above, JPY would be the base currency. Since USD/JPY went from 120 to 110, it would mean that the base currency i.e JPY depreciated.
But JPY has actually appreciated.
What gives? Am I going crazy after reading for 5 hours?
You inverted the ratios. The values you gave are actually for JPY/USD, where USD is base currency. To convert it to JPY as base you need to take reciprocals:
I guess CFAI does it a little bit different than every investing site? After looking into it, I noticed the same thing for EUR/USD.
EUR/USD was ~1.06 December 2014.
Today EUR/USD is ~ 1.11.
According to CFAI convention, you would think that USD got stronger/appreciated (EUR got weaker/depreciated). But in reality, EUR has become stronger/appreciated (USD got weaker/depreciated).
I just want to make sure that I’ll get answers right on the exam with the thinking I described in original post. I don’t care how financial websites quote FX.