I’m working on queston 6 of the 2010 morning exam, and I’m confused about the answer. The answer requires you to figure out that the duration of a fixed payment, 3.5%, 4 year bond = 4. However, from the swaps section, we’re taught that the duration of the fixed leg is .75 x maturiy. So, shouldn’t the duration of a 4 year fixed bond be .75 x 4 = 3?
When calculating the duration of a swap you have to consider both sides of the arrangement.
You are correct that the fixed payer side of the swap in this example is 0.75 x 4 = 3.
However, you will be receiving floating payments as well. In a perfect world if the payments are completely floating and adjust each minte, duration would be zero. However, in real world payments are typically quarterly or semi-annual (meaning the floating payer side is exposed to some duration).
Therefore, the formula for the floating side duration is 1/2 the length of the payment period. For example, if the floating payment is made semi-annually, the duration of that side would be (1/2) x 0.5 = 0.25.
That is subtracted from from the fixed side to get the net duration of the swap.
0.75 is an assumption about the fixed side of a SWAP. ( this is an assumption )
the question he is talking about is a zero-coupon bond of 4yr which you have to know that zero coupon bond duration = maturity . ( this is not a assumption. )
macaulay and modified duration will be equal when the yield is continuously compounded. interesting little tidbit based on the differentiation properties of the exponential function. completely not relevant to the exam tomorrow.