If EVA© is essentially the same as Economic Profit, why does CFAI recognize this pointless trademark?
If I create a mode just like FCFE and call it Smooth Cash Drip to Shareholders© would you give me credit?
If EVA© is essentially the same as Economic Profit, why does CFAI recognize this pointless trademark?
If I create a mode just like FCFE and call it Smooth Cash Drip to Shareholders© would you give me credit?
Yes, then future candidates may have to start calculating SCDS/(r-g)
P/SCDIS price/supersonic cash drip to idle shareholders the most relevant ratio to calculate shareholder’s milking cash power by position of majority shareholders. Easy to estimate: The number of new Mercedes Benz vehicles and private aircraft at MBO/the number of members of MBO (assuming they are majority shareholders as well) value to minority shareholders (1-SCDIFS), in often cases this ratio is about 0,00XX.
I was also thinking of adding a corruption premium to the Pastor-Stambaugh model.
I also wondering using adjustement to stock value due to clueless CEO. Therefore, I’d deduct $AAPL value for Tim Cook,
AAPL (1-Cock:). I know someone maybe disagree, but I’m just wondering, by only as product user side, on what level AAPL would be today with someone else’ leadership.
When Jobs passed away I thought Apple would slowly succumb to Microsoft and Samsung. I kind of looked forward to it too, as it would have further confirmed Jobs’ genius. No such luck.
Since they’re still generating cash based on prior glory, the position of current MBO is still ensured. My user experience is worse than ever and I am a business user.