Exhibit 30 Rolling 6m return CFAI p.84

On page 84, CFAI vol.5, in exhibit 30 there is an example of how to calcualte a rolling 6m returns mean.

For the mean, in stead of 6 periods, 7 periods are taken for the average calculation.

What is the difference between simply calculating the rolling 6m return (i.e. n=6 periods), vs. a roll return mean i.e. why add the additional period.

I hope anyone can help me with this.

Thanks,

Consider you need to do a 3 month rolling return

Jan Feb Mar -> 1st 3 month average return

Feb Mar Apr -> 2nd 3 month average return

Mar Apr May -> 3rd 3 month average

Apr May Jun -> 4th

Rolling Return = (1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th) / 4

hi cpk123,

Thanks for your answer.

I understand how to calculate the RR. However, if you go to the specific example I mentioned in the curriculum, CFAI shows a calculation for a RR 6m mean.

In this example they take 7 periods in stead of 6. My question is therefore, why do they do this?

if you understoodf the above they do 11 months at a time first berfore they did rolling return average for 12 rolling 11 months periods.

same thing … they do rolling returns for 7 rolling 6 month periods…

Not making sense for me either. They are not doing 11 months. t to t-11 is 12 months . And even if it was the case then 7 would be one month more, not less.

It looks weird.

I wouldn’t worry about it; there are a lot more important things in the curriculum about which to worry.