I think “poor upbringing” is probably better than “historical context”, if that’s what you’re going for. Also, in most of these cases, it’s “parent” (not “parents”).
At some point, this context becomes no longer relevant, and we are left with a bunch of people clinging to some notion of the past that did not really apply to them. What happened to your parents’ parents’ parents’ is not the same as what happened to you.
I agree that upbringing has many components, not just “historical context”. But in some cases, I believe throwing out this historical context is the first step to actually achieving better upbringing.
Let me turn this into a statement about performance:
I agree that past performance has many components, not just “historical returns”. But in some cases, I believe throwing out this past performance is the first step to actually achieving better returns.
Someone should put this on the Ameriprise daily AM call.
They’re just the low hanging fruit. There are plenty of very “sophisticated” RIAs out there that do the same thing. It’s a product of charging a fee instead of commissions. Everyone has the ability to change funds anytime for no cost so they’re always chasing something.
I wish I could get clients out of some of their legacy held funds, but the tax hit would be enormous. The math says I can justify higher fees for a long while if the tax can be paid later. Count on the government to disincentivize switching to the newer better product.
The only reason to hate on TLJ is the fact that he introduced Al Gore at the DNC back in 2000. He has made up for that though by being a public supporter of fracing in TX.