Ferro case

Q 26- I picked c- expected return. That looked weird to me. The answer given does not make sense to me:

Excess returns represent the difference, positive or negative, between the total return of all credit securities and Treasury securities along a set of key rate duration points across the term structure. This single statistic, excess return, therefore normalizes for the duration differential among debt asset classes, in this case between longer-duration credit and shorter-duration Treasuries.

Can anybody explain?

???

use an example.

somewhere you have positive duration (where duration > benchmark)

somewhere else on the same portfolio you have negative duration (duration < benchmark)

the two taken together normalize and get the total towards 0 …

Two points

  1. along a set of key rate duration points across the term structure- what is that to do with excess returns? Excess retruns can be from any point not just the key points?

  2. How excess return normalizes duration?

you need to read without missing key words… excess return normalizes DURATION DIFFERENTIAL.

I see the exact same statement that you have shown up here in a case on the text on Pg 63 (under the exhibit 1 on Reading 21 (Relative value Methodologies).