Hoping someone can help clarify the definition of TOTAL FIRM ASSETS.
Total firm assets include all discretionary and non-discretionary assets, but does not include assets assigned to a sub-advisor UNLESS the firm has discretion to select the subadvisor.
My question is, if the firm DOES NOT have discretion over the subadvisor, wouldn’t these assets then be considered as non-discretionary assets which would still fall under “total firm assets” as per the first part of the definition?
I understand that non-discretionary assets should not be considered in composites… But Total firm assets as defined by the curriculum does include non-discretionary assets.
Can anyone clarify? Should client-directed assets to a subadvisor be considered as Total firm assets?