Immunising a single liabilities

AL Capital (ALC), a global asset management company, specializes in active bond
management for institutional clients. Andy Brown is a newly hired portfolio manager at
ALC. Brown is meeting with a prospective client, John Green, of Taboo Manufacturing
™. Green informs Brown that TM has a single $200 million liability due in seven years
with a fixed coupon of 5%. Green wants to construct a bond portfolio to immunize this
obligation.

Portfolio A: Macaulay duration : 7 years
Convexity:34
Portfolio B : Macaulay duration: 7.3 years
Convexity: 14
Why Portfolio B is not selected despite it has lower convexity. Is 0.3 years difference is material?

Duration is far more important than convexity. Light years more important.

You can refer to the textbook, for single liability immunization, three requirments should be met

has an initial market value that equals or exceeds the present value of the liability;

has a portfolio Macaulay duration that matches the liability’s due date;

minimizes the portfolio convexity statistic.

If the convexity of the liability is provided, the final decision could be made.

In my opinion, judging only from Macaulay Duration is a not persuasive enough.

Got it. Thanks

Furthermore, those requirements are listed in order of importance:

  • Value
  • Duration
  • Convexity