I’m not entirely convinced why is it Laurbær partners and not Alcanfor. Alcanfor uses an active strategy so how is that statement general but Laurbær’s statement isn’t?
I also expected Alcanfor to be the correct answer.
However, I rationalised Laurbaer as the solution based on the fact that they are always looking for means to generate new alpha.
And they’re more likely to drop underperforming strategies since they measure the performance of each strategy to performance.
1 Like