In Reading 23 Practice Problem Q4, portfolio B has less convexity than portfolio C and B provides more protection from yield curve shifts and twists.
Shouldn’t more convexity be desirable when considering yield curve changes?
In Reading 23 Practice Problem Q4, portfolio B has less convexity than portfolio C and B provides more protection from yield curve shifts and twists.
Shouldn’t more convexity be desirable when considering yield curve changes?
Don’t confuse protection (holding the bond and protecting yourself) with immunization (matching the bond against a liability).
Can you elaborate on your explanation?
If you are invested in a bond portfolio and not using it to immunise a specific liability then more convexity holding all else equal is a good thing. If you are buying a portfolio to immunise a single liability then you want less convexity with duration matching the main focus.
Thank you.