[question removed by admin]
How does this -not- fall under the mosaic theory?
I thought if you use your own conclusions based on nonpublic nonmaterial info that you can trade on it. I believe this question requires an assumption to be made, and I do not like assuming anything on these exams.
If we are not told whether the information that was discussed was material or nonmaterial, how am I supposed to judge that their conversation contained material info, thereby NOT abiding by mosaic theory?