I know that the formulas are different:
- WCInv = CA (exc. Cash) - CL (exc. ST debt)
- NWCInv = ΔWC = Δ (CA excl. Cash) - Δ (CL excl. ST Debt)
But - when do we actually use WCInv?
Corporate Finance:
NWCInv is used in the “Initial Investment Outlay” formula.
Ex) IIO = FCInv + NWCInv
where NWC = CA required for Investment - CL Generated from Investment (which is same as “additional CA and CL” since it is the additional required to fund that specific project)
Corporate Finance makes sense.
_ Equity: _
CFO (and then FCFF and FCFE consequently) official formulas also use WCInv.
The official formula is CFO = NI + NCC - WCinv
Simple Example:
NI $10
- Depreciation $5
- Increase in AR $1
+Decrease in AP $1
CFO = $15
My question is:
Doesn’t the CFO formula just look at Changes in the WC?
If so, then why is the formula CFO = NI + NCC - WCinv instead of CFO = NI + NCC - NWCinv
Working Capital itself is a net figure. However, when computing these values in both instance we are looking at the changes in the WC from either 1) Corp Finance- Investing in a project or 2) Equity - Period over period
In both instance it seems like both formulas should be NWCInv formula. Correct? Or am I just completely over thinking this? I know how to do the problems when thrown at me but I am just trying to make sense of the formula. Now that I think about it its almost like the formulas will get you the same answer. I dont know!