Reading the example of goal based investments (the smiths example) the describe 4 goals to achieve with different probabilities of success. The point that does not fit to me is the PV calculated for the goal 3 and goal 4 are:
Goal 3
FV 10,000,000.00 N 10 Rate 4.10% PV -6,691,025.81 (instead of -6,671 stated in the reading)
Goal 4
FV 10,000,000.00 N 20 Rate 6.80% PV -2,682,717.52 (instead of -2,679 stated in the readiing)
Thanks
I don’t have access to the LIII material. Is there some sort of probability of failure built in to the lower dollar figures???
Hey Breadmaker,
There doesn’t seem to be. It just seems straight forward and I did goal 1 which did require a bit more work because I had to include inflation. These other two goals just seem to be off. If you can take a look when you have a chance, I would highly appreciate it. Racking my brain on this. It also just seems there a relay of mistakes carrying on from one exhibit to the next that CFA has not addressed. I have another post as well prior to this.
Thanks
Use CFA Institute’s erratum report form to let them know.
My calculations in the Excel file attached. For Goal 1 and 2, there are two types of calculations (one based on formula, one based on the cashflow schedule) for validation.
Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zn6oWfZzsBsF_eCYej_ZPLFdPHEISc8F/view?usp=sharing
1 Like
That was a great response. Thank you. I guess it the institute has a lot of errata to work on here. Thanks. I will message them
1 Like
I love the spreadsheet, thanks again.
One other question. Within exhibit 37 I understand where the value of 7.1% comes from for overall asset allocation. But what about the volatility of 7.6%, how do I solve for this?
I get that all the numbers are incorrect for the proportions but using the institute used those incorrect values to get 7.1% so I understand the technique. I don’t understand how they got 7.6% though.
Thanks to all of you again.
1 Like
You will need the pairwise correlation for the Modules A, C, D and F, i.e. AC, AD, AF, CD, CF, DF. Then do the calculation as you would with a 4-asset portfolio volatility.