The vote is rigged!!

Typical.

You’re either too ignorant, too stupid, or too arrogant to answer a legitimate question, so you resort to personal attacks.

Your posts here are pathetic.

And yet, here you are again on Analyst Forum contributing nothing to the topic, while I have thoroughly analyzed. cool

You flatter yourself.

Your analysis has been superficial and biased. You haven’t answered the simplest of questions about the lack of any rational basis for your conclusions.

You claim that I’m contributing nothing, when it is you who contributes nothing when asked honest questions about your statements.

Your posts here are pathetic.

^ You still haven’t contributed anything (bet you didn’t even read the thread, mod troll). cheeky

Nor have you.

And I’ll happily take that bet; get your chequebook ready.

Perhaps you should quote some of this in your thread about having the mods banned; it hasn’t seen your pathetic whining in several days now.

You can’t know what I’ve contributed since you, as usual, didn’t read the thread. laugh

I like turtles…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y

what the flying f*!% is this! What you doin in here frenchie

You should send PA a check because he’s living rent-free in your head.

PA has used a version of the word “argue” twice since my last post.

He can’t control himself.

A mod should never resort to this kind of language and should act like a statesman. If you have no self control, either step down as mod or create another handle.

HA!! Someone mentioned on a different forum, I have an uncanny ability to turn people into comic characterizations of themselves.

S2000, you should walk away.

So . . . this is what passes for analysis in for you?

No wonder you continually feel the need to tell us how great you are; your “analysis” certainly doesn’t convey that.

Perhaps you’re correct.

Note, however, that purealpha is certainly free to choose which of those three is appropriate, and I’m quite certain that he wouldn’t disagree about his being arrogant.

So that – what? – you can (arrogantly) claim that you won the . . . um . . . discussion?

That would certainly be convenient for you, I’ll admit.

Yes. We have a Nash Equilibrium at “PA is arrogant.” The only difference being that PA believes his arrogance is warranted and the rest of us know otherwise.

Careful: language such as that is bad for mods.

Evidently.

Partially correct, but a pretty slim partial. Points deducted for appeal to mob mentality, “we”. There is no consensus, just the mods patting themselves on the back.

It’s simply confidence in having properly analyzed and reached the correct answer (due to thoroughness of analysis and historic correctness). Correct answers aren’t really “warranted”, they just are. Arrogance is irrelevant.

Bottom line, you can’t “know otherwise” if you can’t comprehend the analysis. enlightened

There is no thorough analysis nor correct answer, simply purealpha patting himself on the back.

This coming from a guy who thinks an asteroid has to hit Apple HQ to affect the stock! Let me spell it out for you, drink some tea since you seem a little slow today. Tunguska. That was the last relatively large rock that hit earth. Actually, to be specific it never actually “hit” the earth. It was moving with such speed that it heated the air to a degree that caused it to detonate 25,000 feet above the surface of Earth with the power of eight hundred nuclear bombs. Reindeer thirty miles away were struck dead. People’s clothes combusted at sixty miles away. 700 square miles of forest were flattened.

If it fell five hours later, it would have destroyed St. Petersburg and everyone in it. And it didn’t even hit. And it was small, 60 meters or so across. surprise