I feel like PA is the Tony Robbins of Finance, just without the insane popularity.
Lol. I swear PA came from the same realm as QqqBee. There’s some interdimensional portal open somewhere deep in the ocean and they just keep coming out of it.
Though, igor555’s photo says it all.
Shrug, “feel like”, and popularity, do not change biology.
Me, I just stick diligently to the unpopular facts. 
He needs to post a topless selfie in the fitness thread. Otherwise what he says is void.
See my threads on deteriorating reasoning abilities around here.
My analysis can be correct, and I can be class 5 obese. 
there may be a “growing” body of evidence but there is a mountain of evidence that processed food, fried food, overeating and red meat are all bad. grains and pulses (they are typically grouped together) are a high and efficient source of fibre and often provide nutrition that is difficult to acquire elsewhere. grains and pulses “may” have some negative long-term effects but they also help keep your regular which improves digestive and intestinal health, and reduces colorectal and other digestive/intestinal tract cancers, and improves mood and productivity. while grains and pulses “may” have negative effects long-term, the short-term benefit of grains on your intestinal system far outweighs these potential and unsubstantiated long-term concerns. eating grains also helps control appetite but can help prevent society’s perpetual overeating problem. studies show that those who eat grains have much healthier BMIs than those who do not. imagine if you took a sample of people who eat solely whole grains and how their BMIs would look!
i think the issue with grains and pulses is their usage. are you eating grains as a coating for fried fish or as a donut or are you eating whole grain granola, breads or cereals? if you’re eating the part of the grain with no fibre or nutrients, yes it’s bad, if you’re eating the whole package, it’s good.
Your thing is really horrible handling of data, including cherry picking, and then poor reasoning on top of that bad data. It’s always a mess, and really no way to sort it out…you just have to erase all your beliefs, and start over with the raw data.
you talk about cherry picking but you don’t identify what is cherry picking. accept reality pa, or it will not accept you.
It’s like your “analysis” on the Shanghai Composite, and many other topics, the data simply does not say what you are saying. Are you going to go back to the 1950s Lipid Hypothesis now? LOL. That was already tested dude, since the 1970s Americans switched to less animal fat, less red meat, and more “healthy grains” (data below in Excel). What was the result of that experiment? They got sicker; see metabolic syndrome epidemic. Why did this happen? My theory backtests perfectly, it would have predicted this result. http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/USFoodSupply-1909-2010
So PA, what is the optimal diet then accoring to your theory?
thread should be renamed “this is why American people are fat”
^the chances he is virul are slim.
The above formula works across location, time, and species. It is THE most elegant formula for optimal nutrition that can ever exist. Nobody has ever been able to improve on it (since I published it in 2013-ish), cause it’s already the best it can be, and because they can’t even understand the simple sentence LOL! You know, it’s really embarrassing nobody else figures these things out. My whole life is like “uhh didn’t anyone do the simple math?”. Then I show them the math, and they are like “uh, where am I, what is happening, where is my Brondo?”.
less animal fat. sure. less red meat. sure. more healthy grains. sure.
and… more fried food. more processed food. more food in general. more sugary drinks. more alcohol. less exercise. more drug use.
further, your charts indicate rising calorie consumption, rising protein consumption, flat fibre consumption, rising fat consumption. no wonder people fee like $hit compared to the past. they can’t take a crap. thanks for adding more evidence to my case.
actually…there are studies that show whole grains may be worse for you than processed ‘white’ grains because the bleaching process takes away the negative attributes of whole grains, mainly their capacity as an inhibitor of nutrient absorption. if you want to boil it down to a single attribute that makes it good or bad, the simple fact that it is one of the most acid forming foods one can eat in a standard american diet (same with sugar), should alone make it a food to absolutely avoid. look at any study that deals with acidity of diet and how that causes inflammation in the body, which is the root cause of many chronic ailments.
i mean, go ahead and keep eating what you want and remain sub optimal. more for me.
No, again you are mixing together true and false things, in a weird random-logic milkshake.
Fat consumption stays mostly flat and it’s not relevant anyhow. What is relevant, it is a switch from animal fat (low delta food) to grain fat (high delta food). This drives the decrease in HDL and increase in LDL – the body doesn’t know what to do with that weird grain fat (evolutionary biology kids). The frying doesn’t necessarily make a difference. Fry it in lard, now it’s healthy, per my formula.
This is why people keep getting the wrong answer, they don’t understand basic things (evolution). Correct answers have predictive power.
Exactly! Since you remove the specific thing in the food the animal is not yet adapted to, the “adaptation delta” (I need to think of a term here) becomes smaller. Again seen in my formula.
all i am reading is paleo and gluten-free freaks who will be proven wrong in two years when this most recent trend is over. if you’re not supposed to eat whole grains and pulses which are two of the only natural things you can consume that allow you to go crap that has some substance to it, what are you supposed to eat? fat concentration in grains is like 1%. i don’t see how adding 2g of grain fat a day to your diet is hurting you. meanwhile, animal proteins have fat concentraitons of 15%-30%. it’s not like it’s a 1 for 1 switch and at 2g of grain fat per day, good luck with coming up with a substantive case. people probably breath more than 2g of pollutants into their bodies every day.
This might be the bullshittiest answer anybody not a politician has ever given.