Topic Test: Babb Partners case, Asset Allocation and related decisions in PM (2)

Fund return: -25 %, -20 %, -12%, -8%, -2%, 0 %, 6 %, 9 %

Probability: 0.005, 0.02, 0.025, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.25, 0.1

Mean fund return : 1.53 % annually

Fund return volatility: 6.47 annually

Fund value: USD 110 mln

Q: the VaR at the 5 % level is calculated as…

a) USD 13.2

b) USD 22.0

c) USD 12.0

My calculation was 0.0153 - (1.65 x 0.0647) = -0.091455, then -0.091455 x 110 mln = 10,06 mln. Correct answer is simply 0.12 % x 110 mln= 13.2 mln. Why are we not using the first equation? Is it because we are not being asked to calculate the yearly VaR?

analytical VAR method vs. Historical VAR method.

You used Analytical - bcos they gave you the Prob and fund % - they used the Historical VAR method.

Thank you!