I have been struggling to understand why VaR does not incorporate positive results. I am aware that VaR is a measure of downside potential and hence focused on rather negative results, however since its underlying formula is: exp. return portfolio - z*(stand. dev!), it led me to the conclusion that not only negative results but also positive results among the distrubution are counted, since we take the entire standard deviation and not a downside deviation/semi-variance or something similar.
Here a statement: ‘VaR incompletely measures risk exposure because it does not incorporate positive results into its risk profile’
definition of Z-value in wikipedia (yes, ignore the source for these purposes):
“In statistics, the standard score is the signed number of standard deviations by which the value of an observation or data point is above the mean value of what is being observed or measured.Observed values above the mean have positive standard scores, while values below the mean have negative standard scores.”
VaR formula subtracts the product of (the positive z-score for the relevant probability %) x (standard deviation)
So by definition we are subtracting the positive portion of the standard deviation and keeping the portion below the mean, that is, the negative return volatility.