Hi! It is stated that bond A has a dd of 747 which I find extremely high, aren’t duration values usually like from 1-10? Or what am I missing here?
I don’t know how to approach this problem.
Bond A is a 25-year/6% bond selling at 70.3570. Bond A has a dollar duration of 747.2009. Bond B is a 20-year/5% bond selling at 70.3570. Bond B has a modified duration of 10.62. When the market interest rate increases from 9% to 9.1%? Which of the following is incorrect?
A. the approximate dollar price change of Bond A is $ -0.0747
B. the approximate percentage price change of Bond A is -0.106%
C. the approximate percentage price change of Bond B is -1.062%
D. the approximate percentage price change of Bond B is -10.62%
and 10.62\times 70.3570=747.2009 so both bonds have a modified duration of 10.62 and both bonds have a dollar duration of 747.2009
since the modified duration is the same for both bonds, at most 1 (and possibly none) of B,C, and D can be true.
I’ll leave that as an exercise for @gneger:
if the modified duration is 10.62, what is the approximate percentage price change of the bonds in response to a 0.1% rise in interest rate?
The high dollar duration for Bond A is due to its long term (25 years). To calculate the price change:
For Bond A: Price change ≈ -747.2009 × 0.001 = -$0.0747 (Option A is correct).
For Bond B: Percentage change ≈ -10.62 × 0.001 = -1.062% (Option C is correct).
Option D is incorrect because the percentage change for Bond B is -1.062%, not -10.62%.
you might want to check your math: -747.2009 × 0.001 = -$0.747, not -$0.0747
As I said 3 posts up, I think there’s a typo (either in the original question or gneger’s transcription) and the question should have said
Which of the following is correct?