Volatility including currency risk

Hi guys, the book doesn’t make an accent on this, but why when calculating portfolio variance, which includes currency risk, we don’t consider the portfolio as being composed of 50% asset and 50% currency. The wieghts on both are equal to 1 instead.

VarPtf = Var Asset + Var Currency + 2*StdAsset*StdCurrency*Correl(Asset,Currency)

instead of

VarPtf = Var Asset * sqr(0.5) + Var Currency * sqr(0.5) + 2*0.5*0.5*StdAsset*StdCurrency*Correl(Asset,Currency)

Thanks!

how is it 50% asset and 50% currency?

you have 100 Euro - that is 100% of the foreign asset

that entire 100 Euro is converted to $ - that is 100% foreign currency

isn’t it?

100% of your portfolio is the foreign asset and 100% of your portfolio is subject to exchange rate risk, as cpk123 says.

The weights are both 1; they don’t add to 1.

What about Alan Steven case in mock 2011 q 43 and 44 with standard deviation of returns and currency contribution this from a reading 28 section. 3.2 can someone in simple words explain this? Much appreciated…

that is from the previous reading - and does not pertain to this year’s curriculum.

So it is not from reading 28??? Seems like volatility decomposition no?

i should say 44 is not relevant, 43 still is.